Summary
holding that ORCP 23 B authorized the amendment of a complaint to conform to the evidence at trial in an FED action
Summary of this case from Balboa Apartments v. PatrickOpinion
March 21, 2000
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 21, 2000
330 Or. 138 (Or. 2000)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Mar 21, 2000
330 Or. 138 (Or. 2000)
holding that ORCP 23 B authorized the amendment of a complaint to conform to the evidence at trial in an FED action
Summary of this case from Balboa Apartments v. Patrickdeclining to infer without evidence that the father's conduct of sexually abusing teenage females before the birth of his 2- and 3-year-old daughters was a "conduct or condition that [was] seriously detrimental" to the daughters for purposes of termination of the father's parental rights
Summary of this case from Dep't of Human Servs. v. Z. M. (In re S. M.)distinguishing the plaintiff’s claims seeking to enjoin submission of ballot measure for vote and reverse Secretary of State’s decision to submit, both of which were rendered moot by election, from claim seeking declaration that the measure was enacted in violation of the constitution and was therefore void, which remained a live controversy and therefore was not moot
Summary of this case from De Young v. Browndistinguishing cases
Summary of this case from Weyerhaeuser Co. v. EllisonCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Mar 21, 2000
Citations
330 Or. 138 (Or. 2000)
Citing Cases
State v. Silva
Tucker, 330 Or. at 91. We applied the holding in Morton in State v. Cook, 163 Or. App. 24, 986 P.2d 1228…
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. EllisonIn both Eckles and Hughes, cited as examples by employer, the statutes at issue placed the state in…