concluding that the defendant voluntarily consented to a search by his probation officer, when, "[o]ther than the pressure on defendant not to violate the terms of his probation, there was nothing coercive about the circumstances"
Summary of this case from State v. Stevens1995.
concluding that the defendant voluntarily consented to a search by his probation officer, when, "[o]ther than the pressure on defendant not to violate the terms of his probation, there was nothing coercive about the circumstances"
Summary of this case from State v. StevensFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
We rejected petitioner's premise, noting that the "death sentence applied to both convictions [for]…
State v. GuzmanThe state's next argument relies on the condition of defendant's probation that provides that he consent to a…