determining that a seven-month delay between the issuance of a warrant and an unsuccessful attempt to serve the warrant was not an unreasonable delay for purposes of commencing a prosecution within the statute of limitations period, ORS 131.135, where the state had entered the warrant into local and national law enforcement databases two and one-half months after the warrant issued
Summary of this case from State v. RalstonFebruary 6, 1990.
determining that a seven-month delay between the issuance of a warrant and an unsuccessful attempt to serve the warrant was not an unreasonable delay for purposes of commencing a prosecution within the statute of limitations period, ORS 131.135, where the state had entered the warrant into local and national law enforcement databases two and one-half months after the warrant issued
Summary of this case from State v. RalstonFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Feb 6, 1990
In short, Burks and Vu, and other analogous Oregon cases decided under Article I, section 12, focus…
Yamaha Store of Bend, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp.32901; CA A44218 Argued and submitted May 24, affirmed on appeal and on cross-appeal September 6,…