Summary
rejecting ex post facto and single subject challenges to ORS 136.432
Summary of this case from State v. RayOpinion
1999.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1999
328 Or. 275 (Or. 1999)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1999
328 Or. 275 (Or. 1999)
rejecting ex post facto and single subject challenges to ORS 136.432
Summary of this case from State v. Rayrecognizing that it is "fairly common for the legislature to specify that a statutory term includes something that does not fit neatly into what the term generally means"
Summary of this case from Boyd v. Essinoutlining history and purpose of SB 936
Summary of this case from State v. Bakerdiscussing difference between statutes that specify what a term "means" and those that specify merely what the term "includes"
Summary of this case from Edwards v. Riverdale School Distexplaining relationship of terms
Summary of this case from Fox v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.describing differences between what term "includes" and what it "means"
Summary of this case from State v. Courtieroutlining history and purpose of SB 936
Summary of this case from State v. McCoyCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1999
Citations
328 Or. 275 (Or. 1999)
Citing Cases
Fox v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.
" Defendants argue, and we agree, that the Vincent vehicle was neither "uninsured" nor "underinsured."…
Vossen v. Forrester951769; CA A96078.Argued and submitted May 27, 1998. Reversed and remanded August 5, 1998. Petition for…