From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 17, 2001
332 Or. 56 (Or. 2001)

Summary

holding that, if the trial court has jurisdiction, it may not dismiss a declaratory judgment claim but should enter a declaration of the parties' rights

Summary of this case from Karson v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm

Opinion

April 17, 2001


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 17, 2001
332 Or. 56 (Or. 2001)

holding that, if the trial court has jurisdiction, it may not dismiss a declaratory judgment claim but should enter a declaration of the parties' rights

Summary of this case from Karson v. Oregon Liquor Control Comm

concluding that unfolding a folded piece of paper discovered in defendant's purse was within the scope of defendant's consent where the officer requested to search defendant's car for “checks”

Summary of this case from State v. Winn

explaining significance of a person not objecting or withdrawing previously given consent when an officer conducting a consent search begins to open a container

Summary of this case from State v. Lamoreux
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 17, 2001

Citations

332 Or. 56 (Or. 2001)

Citing Cases

Outdoor Media Dimensions, Inc. v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Branch

The problem is that, since Fidanque, we have continued to endorse the holding and rationale of Outdoor Media…

Drayton v. D.O.T

E. Other Arguments In addition to the foregoing arguments, petitioner challenges the constitutionality of the…