Summary
holding that a sentencing court can consider conduct that did not result in criminal convictions
Summary of this case from State v. GreenoughOpinion
1995.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1995
321 Or. 340 (Or. 1995)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1995
321 Or. 340 (Or. 1995)
holding that a sentencing court can consider conduct that did not result in criminal convictions
Summary of this case from State v. Greenoughrecognizing that the UFTA "codifies principles recognized by the courts prior to its enactment"
Summary of this case from Twigg v. Opsahlstating preponderance of evidence standard
Summary of this case from Norris v. R & T Manufacturing, LLCCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
Citations
321 Or. 340 (Or. 1995)
Citing Cases
State v. Taylor
The state also argues that simply asking a passenger to get out of a car does not constitute a "stop" and…
Twigg v. OpsahlThe UFTA was not intended to displace other legal remedies unless explicitly provided by its terms. See ORS…