sustaining admissibility of expert's testimony that "one of the classic diagnostic indicators of [battered child syndrome] is that the child's caretakers change the explanations for the child's injuries"
Summary of this case from State v. Remme1994.
sustaining admissibility of expert's testimony that "one of the classic diagnostic indicators of [battered child syndrome] is that the child's caretakers change the explanations for the child's injuries"
Summary of this case from State v. Remmeallowing experts to testify on battered child syndrome as long as the testimony does not comment on the credibility of other witnesses
Summary of this case from State v. FaufataFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
Accordingly, requirements for a "motor vehicle liability insurance policy" set out in ORS chapters 806 and…
State v. ZelinkaBecause the statute does not implicate First Amendment rights, the appropriate inquiry is "whether the…