noting that the defendant had not preserved argument that officers' initial warrantless entry into his house, in response to neighbor's report of burglary in progress, was not justified by exigent circumstances
Summary of this case from State v. Torres1995.
noting that the defendant had not preserved argument that officers' initial warrantless entry into his house, in response to neighbor's report of burglary in progress, was not justified by exigent circumstances
Summary of this case from State v. Torresreasoning that the law of the case doctrine does not "apply to every statement about the law or the facts that the court happens to venture in the course of rendering its decisions" and that, where a statement is "entirely unnecessary to the disposition of the appeal and was dictum," we are not bound by the statement
Summary of this case from Allen v. County of Jackson Countyexplaining law-of-the-case rule
Summary of this case from Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. GordineerFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
Time was of the essence if an injured person indeed were there; and it also was of the essence if an…
Douglass v. Allstate Ins. Co.152 Or App at 221-22. In Lind v. Allstate Ins. Co., 134 Or. App. 395, 402, 895 P.2d 327, adhered to as…