Summary
remanding case to trial court for findings of fact to support its conclusion of law that Rule 11 sanctions were inappropriate
Summary of this case from Taylor v. Taylor Products, Inc.Opinion
1990
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1990
327 N.C. 636 (N.C. 1990)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1990
327 N.C. 636 (N.C. 1990)
remanding case to trial court for findings of fact to support its conclusion of law that Rule 11 sanctions were inappropriate
Summary of this case from Taylor v. Taylor Products, Inc.Case details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1990
Citations
327 N.C. 636 (N.C. 1990)
Citing Cases
Lowder v. All Star Mills
1) that here W. Horace Lowder has appealed on behalf of the corporate defendants despite this Court's…
Tucker v. WestlakeThere is no question that Rule 408 necessarily requires an existing dispute before it is applicable. See…