From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 13, 2000
767 So. 2d 609 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 3D00-2374

Opinion filed September 13, 2000. July Term, A.D. 2000

An appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Stanford Blake, Judge. L.T. NO. 96-27765C

Braulio H. Perez, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, COPE and RAMIREZ, JJ.


Braulio H. Perez appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. As it appears that the same relief was requested in an earlier motion, and the denial of that relief was affirmed by this court in Perez v. State, 756 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), we conclude that the earlier ruling is res judicata and accordingly affirm the denial of the present motion.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 13, 2000
767 So. 2d 609 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Perez v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRAULIO H. PEREZ, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 13, 2000

Citations

767 So. 2d 609 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Isom v. State

These issues were therefore litigated and decided on the merits and thus fail on an application of the law of…

Allen v. State

either time barred, see Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(c)(4)(B); Partridge v. Moore, 768 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000),…