From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 22, 1979
38 Or. App. 90 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion


588 P.2d 1132 (Or.App. 1979) 38 Or.App. 90 STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Carl Gerald BLAIR, Respondent. No. B46-293; CA 12166. Court of Appeals of Oregon. January 22, 1979

       Argued and Submitted Jan. 16, 1979.

       Jonathan H. Fussner, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lane County, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was J. Pat Horton, Dist. Atty., Lane County, Eugene.

       Michael F. Fox, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Hoffman, Morris, Van Rysselberghes&sGiustina, Eugene.

       Before SCHWAB, C. J., and THORNTON, LEE and GILLETTE, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       Reversed and remanded for trial. State v. Larsen, 37 Or.App. 425, 588 P.2d 41 (1978).


Summaries of

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jan 22, 1979
38 Or. App. 90 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Case Details

Full title:PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 22, 1979

Citations

38 Or. App. 90 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)
38 Or. App. 90

Citing Cases

State v. Blair

On Review from the Court of Appeals. Appeal from District Court, Lane County. Maurice K. Merten, Judge. 38…

State v. Barnett

We conclude that the time allowed was sufficient and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in…