From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pepsico v. F H Kosher Supermarket

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Dec 12, 2011
11-CV-0425(RRM)(ALC) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2011)

Opinion

11-CV-0425(RRM)(ALC).

December 12, 2011.


ORDER


Plaintiff PepsiCo, Inc. ("PepsiCo"), filed its complaint in the instant action on January 28, 2011, alleging that defendant F H Supermarket, Inc., d/b/a Schwartz Kosher Supermarket, d/b/a Schwartz Self Service Grocery, d/b/a Schwartz Grocery Store ("Schwartz"), sold within the United States soft drinks bearing the PEPSI marks that were manufactured, bottled, and meant for sale only in Israel and are materially different from the soft drinks PepsiCo sells in the United States under the PEPSI marks. (Deci, of Anthony DiPaolo ("DiPaolo Deci.") (Doc. No. 5-1) at ¶ 2; Compi. (Doc. No. 1) ¶¶ 12-16.) PepsiCo alleged that Schwartz's unauthorized sales were likely to cause consumer confusion and dilution. (Compi. (Doc. No. 1) at ¶¶ 18, 31-36, 38-39.) On March 11, 2011, plaintiff moved for default against defendant because it failed to respond to the complaint or appear in the action. On March 15, 2011 and June 6, 2011, this Court referred plaintiffs default motion to the assigned Magistrate Judge, the Honorable Andrew L. Carter, for a Report and Recommendation (the "RR") in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

On August 26, 2011, Judge Carter issued an RR recommending that default judgment enter in favor of plaintiff and that this Court issue a permanent injunction against defendant and award plaintiff attorneys' fees in the amount of $18,440.59. Judge Carter reminded the parties that, pursuant to Rule 72(b), any objections were due 14 days from the date of the RR. To date, no party has filed any objections. As reflected in the proof of service filed by plaintiffs counsel (Doc. No. 10), defendant was served with the RR on August 29, 2011.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the RR for clear error and, finding none, concurs with the RR in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Accordingly, the RR is adopted in its entirety.

It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for default judgment (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED. F H Kosher Supermarket, Inc., d/b/a Schwartz Kosher Supermarket, d/b/a Schwartz Self Service Grocery, d/b/a Schwartz Grocery Store, and its officers, agents, servants, employees, successors and assigns, and all others in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Order by personal service or otherwise, are hereby permanently enjoined and restrained from the importation into, and the dealing, marketing, sale or distribution in the United States of soft drinks manufactured or bottled in Israel bearing PepsiCo's famous federally registered trademarks PEPSI, PEPSI-COLA, the distinctive red, white and blue logo, and combinations of variations on this logo with PEPSI and PEPSI-COLA. Judgment shall enter in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $18,440.59 for attorney's fees and related expenses.

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, mail a copy of this Order and the Judgment to defendant, and close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pepsico v. F H Kosher Supermarket

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Dec 12, 2011
11-CV-0425(RRM)(ALC) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Pepsico v. F H Kosher Supermarket

Case Details

Full title:PEPSICO v. F H KOSHER SUPERMARKET

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Dec 12, 2011

Citations

11-CV-0425(RRM)(ALC) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2011)

Citing Cases

George Nelson Found. v. Modernica, Inc.

Starbucks Corp., 588 F.3d at 114 (noting this was also the case in federal law before the TDRA). This case is…