Opinion
November 9, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Zweibel, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We reject the defendant's contention that the introduction of evidence of uncharged crimes constituted reversible error (see, People v Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264; see also, People v Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233; People v Ventimiglia, 52 N.Y.2d 350). His claim that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is similarly without merit (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146).
The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.