Opinion
March 30, 1987
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cohen, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's request that the prosecution turn over to him a Grand Jury synopsis sheet. We have reviewed the same and find that it was not an abbreviated summary of an interview with any of the People's witnesses and did not constitute Rosario material (see, People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, cert denied 368 U.S. 866; People v. Davis, 87 A.D.2d 597). Further, since the synopsis sheet was the duplicative equivalent of material already turned over to the defendant, the prosecution violated no duty of disclosure by refusing to reveal its contents (see, People v. Consolazio, 40 N.Y.2d 446, 454).
In addition, the defendant was properly sentenced as a second violent felony offender, inasmuch as he conceded his status. We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, J.P., Rubin, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.