From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Whitley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 9, 1990
164 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

August 9, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.).


On defendant's initial appeal, counsel challenged the trial court's denial of his motion for a severance and for a mistrial. This court unanimously affirmed without opinion ( 128 A.D.2d 449). Upon reargument, defendant submits a pro se supplemental brief reiterating the point concerning denial of his severance motion, and raising five additional points. None of these points merits departure from our original determination.

Defendant's failure to move for dismissal of the indictment for denial of his statutory right to testify before the Grand Jury constituted a waiver of his right to challenge the indictment on that ground (People v Reddy, 108 A.D.2d 945, 946). The circumstances surrounding defendant's warrantless arrest were no bar to his subsequent prosecution (see, United States v Crews, 445 U.S. 463).

Failure to call a witness to "explain" defendant's own medical records revealing that he had suffered a beating at the hands of the murder victim the day before, and failure to request a visit to the crime scene notwithstanding the submission of the crime scene photos in evidence, did not constitute ineffectiveness of assistance of trial counsel. The charge of "unethical behavior" leveled against the prosecutor has not been preserved for appeal, defendant having failed to object to the manner of the trial court's prompt, curative instructions (People v Tardbania, 72 N.Y.2d 852). There was no Rosario violation with regard to the police report of an interview of an eyewitness, inasmuch as neither the interviewer nor the interviewee was called as a witness. Furthermore, the report did not constitute a Brady violation inasmuch as defendant had in his possession a redacted version of the report prior to trial, and then failed to avail himself of the opportunity to call the police author of the report as a witness with regard to this supposedly exculpatory material (see, People v Cortijo, 70 N.Y.2d 868).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Asch, Rosenberger and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Whitley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 9, 1990
164 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Whitley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CALVIN WHITLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 9, 1990

Citations

164 A.D.2d 782 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
559 N.Y.S.2d 324

Citing Cases

Whitley v. Senkowski

On August 9, 1990, after several back and forths, the Appellate Division rejected Whitley's proffered…

Whitley v. Senkowski

The Court adhered to its prior ruling. People v. Whitley, 164 A.D.2d 782 (1st Dep't 1990). Leave to appeal to…