From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ware

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 1997
245 A.D.2d 85 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 9, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.).


The trial court properly declined to require the prosecutor to provide race-neutral explanations for his use of peremptory challenges, because defendant failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. The mere number of peremptory challenges exercised by the prosecution against African-Americans did not establish a prima facie case (see, People v. Jenkins, 84 N.Y.2d 1001), particularly where, as here, Caucasians constituted but a small proportion of the entire pool of prospective jurors.

Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Ware

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 9, 1997
245 A.D.2d 85 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Ware

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BOBBY WARE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 9, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 85 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 869

Citing Cases

Rosario v. Ercole

The Appellate Division rejected petitioner's arguments, stating: Defendant failed to make a prima facie…

People v. Willingham

Other than his bare assertion that the prosecution had "no good reason" for exercising its peremptory…