From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 1975
49 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

September 29, 1975


Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County, imposed July 5, 1973, upon his conviction of robbery in the second degree, on his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate prison term not to exceed 12 years. Sentence reversed, on the law, and case remitted to the Criminal Term for resentencing. The sentence imposed was not excessive. However, CPL 380.50 provides that, before pronouncing sentence, the court must ask the defendant whether he wishes to make a statement personally on his own behalf. Substantial compliance with this requirement is sufficient and an ambiguous invitation may be held sufficient in some circumstances (People v McLain, 35 N.Y.2d 483). In the present case, although counsel was specifically invited to speak, nothing was said to defendant. To comply with the statute, there must be some invitation to defendant to speak. Rabin, Acting P.J., Latham, Cohalan, Margett and Christ, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Wade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 29, 1975
49 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

People v. Wade

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARD WADE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 29, 1975

Citations

49 A.D.2d 770 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

People v. Ziolkowski

We reject that contention. Although County Court began to sentence defendant to an indeterminate term of…

People v. Premo

While the second felony offender sentence imposed upon defendant does not appear to be excessive in light of…