From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Velazquez

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 15, 1988
534 N.E.2d 29 (N.Y. 1988)

Summary

reviewing for sufficiency of the evidence

Summary of this case from Com. v. Reppert

Opinion

Argued November 15, 1988

Decided December 15, 1988

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, James Leff, J.

Lynn A. Dummett and Pamela K. Phillips for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (David I. Futter and Donald J. Siewert of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The undisturbed factual finding regarding propriety of the denial of defendant's suppression motion is supported by the record and therefore beyond further review. The Appellate Division having decided the suppression issue, we do not pass on the validity of defendant's waiver. Defendant's remaining arguments are without merit or unpreserved.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Velazquez

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 15, 1988
534 N.E.2d 29 (N.Y. 1988)

reviewing for sufficiency of the evidence

Summary of this case from Com. v. Reppert
Case details for

People v. Velazquez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID VELAZQUEZ…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 15, 1988

Citations

534 N.E.2d 29 (N.Y. 1988)
534 N.E.2d 29
537 N.Y.S.2d 112

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

This result is illogical and, one may submit, infeasible from the perspective of practical experience. While…

People v. Russo

In light of the testimony at the suppression hearing and the rule that consent may be established by conduct…