From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Veale

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 10, 1991
78 N.Y.2d 1022 (N.Y. 1991)

Opinion

Decided October 10, 1991

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Eugene M. Hanofee, J.

John Ferrara and Carl J. Silverstein for appellant.

Stephen F. Lungen, District Attorney (K.C. Garn of counsel), for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 169 A.D.2d 939), except insofar as it addresses defendant's assertion that his sentence was excessive, which contention is beyond the scope of this Court's power of review.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

People v. Veale

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 10, 1991
78 N.Y.2d 1022 (N.Y. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Veale

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LAWRENCE VEALE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 10, 1991

Citations

78 N.Y.2d 1022 (N.Y. 1991)
576 N.Y.S.2d 207
582 N.E.2d 590

Citing Cases

People v. Wright

Were we to review these remarks, if they were in any way misleading or prejudicial, defendant suffered no…

People v. Townsend

However, the record before us fails to reflect such request by defendant (see, People v Vilardi, 76 N.Y.2d…