From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 10, 2000
275 A.D.2d 234 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

August 10, 2000.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered December 17, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him to a term of 12 1/2 to 25 years, consecutive to two concurrent terms of 2 1/2 to 5 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

William McGuire, for respondent.

Martin M. Lucente, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Ellerin, J.P., Rubin, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.


Defendant's Batson application (Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79) was properly denied. After the prosecutor came forward with race-neutral explanations for the challenges at issue, defendant did not contest any of the prosecutor's explanations. Thus, defendant has failed to preserve this issue for appellate review (see, People v. Allen, 86 N.Y.2d 101, 111), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the record supports the court's finding that the prosecutor's explanations were not pretextual, a finding entitled to great deference on appeal (see, People v. Hernandez, 75 N.Y.2d 350, affd 500 U.S. 352).

Defendant's request for a justification charge was properly denied. Under the circumstances of this case, viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, we find no reasonable view of the evidence which would support a justification defense (see, People v. Watts, 57 N.Y.2d 299, 301). The evidence clearly established that defendant was the initial aggressor and that the exception contained in Penal Law § 35.15(b) did not apply, that defendant used excessive force, and that defendant was obligated to retreat. As to each of these issues, there was no reasonable view to the contrary.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 10, 2000
275 A.D.2d 234 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK RESPONDENT, v. DARRELL THOMAS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 10, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 234 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
712 N.Y.S.2d 35

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Duncan

As to each of these issues, there was no reasonable view to the contrary. People v. Thomas, 275 A.D.2d 234,…

People v. Watson

reserve both defendant's “substantive objections to the court's ultimate ruling” and “his claim that, in…