From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Suphal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 2008
51 A.D.3d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2001-04337.

May 27, 2008.

Appeal by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 3, 2004 ( see People v Suphal, 7 AD3d 547), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 7, 2001.

van Michael Suphal, a/k/a Michael Suphal, Ossining, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Sholom J. Twersky of counsel), for respondent. Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Reyna E. Marder of counsel), former appellate counsel.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Rivera, Spolzino and Miller, JJ.


Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).


Summaries of

People v. Suphal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 2008
51 A.D.3d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Suphal

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. IVAN MICHAEL SUPHAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 27, 2008

Citations

51 A.D.3d 1044 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 4893
857 N.Y.S.2d 501

Citing Cases

Suphal v. Marshall

People v. Suphal, 839 N.Y.S.2d 474, 478 (2006). Suphal then petitioned the Appellate Division for a writ of…

People v. Suphal

October 3, 2008. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 51 AD3d 1044 (Kings). Pigott,…