From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Sullivan

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Oct 1, 1928
94 Cal.App. 222 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928)

Opinion

Docket No. 1054.

October 1, 1928.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from an order denying a new trial. John F. Pullen, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

No appearance for Appellants.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.


THE COURT.

The defendants were convicted in the superior court of Sacramento County of a felony, to wit, the crime of robbery of the first degree.

[1] The transcript on appeal was filed in this court September 5, 1928. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellants. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on October 1, 1928. No appearance was made for appellants at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgments and the order are affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Sullivan

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Oct 1, 1928
94 Cal.App. 222 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928)
Case details for

People v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. JAMES SULLIVAN et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Oct 1, 1928

Citations

94 Cal.App. 222 (Cal. Ct. App. 1928)
270 P. 968

Citing Cases

In Matter of Conner

In order to make the rule an effective exercise of jurisdiction the phrase "by the institution of such…

State ex Rel. Chubb v. Sartorius

(4) In a case such as the present, where power and jurisdiction of an inferior court is questioned, the court…