From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Stockard

Supreme Court of Michigan. Reported Below: 48 Mich. App. 680
Apr 18, 1974
219 N.W.2d 68 (Mich. 1974)

Opinion

Docket No. 55,240.

April, 18, 1974.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Bruce A. Barton, Prosecuting Attorney, and James M. Justin, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people. State Appellate Defender (by John B. Phelps), for defendant. (Docket No. 55,240.) Reported below: 48 Mich. App. 680.


ORDER

On order of the Court, the application by defendant and appellant for leave to appeal is considered and the same is granted. The Court on its own motion, pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4) summarily affirms the defendant's conviction. The Court of Appeals is clearly in error, however, in holding that defendant per se is precluded from assigning as error on appeal a failure to grant a motion for change of venue because defendant failed to exhaust all peremptory challenges.


Summaries of

People v. Stockard

Supreme Court of Michigan. Reported Below: 48 Mich. App. 680
Apr 18, 1974
219 N.W.2d 68 (Mich. 1974)
Case details for

People v. Stockard

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v STOCKARD

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan. Reported Below: 48 Mich. App. 680

Date published: Apr 18, 1974

Citations

219 N.W.2d 68 (Mich. 1974)
219 N.W.2d 68

Citing Cases

People v. Ranes

The record on appeal does not indicate that the jurors selected would be unable to render an impartial…

People v. Prast

This burden is not fulfilled by a mere showing of pretrial publicity unless it is also shown that an…