From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Steinberg, Rutkins, Thiede, Valentine

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 12, 1938
277 N.Y. 728 (N.Y. 1938)

Summary

In People v. Steinberg (277 N.Y. 728) (collapse of a building) there was no opinion in any court but the District Attorney stated in the record on appeal: "They saw the many violations of law which were indulged in."

Summary of this case from People v. Joseph

Opinion

Argued March 16, 1938

Decided April 12, 1938

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

George Z. Medalie and Jack Horowitz for Louis Steinberg et al., appellants.

Seymour Mork and Irving Weiss for Harry B. Rutkins, appellant.

Karl Propper for Michael C.E. Thiede, appellant.

Howard Henig for Vincent A. Valentine, appellant.

Samuel J. Foley, District Attorney ( Sol. Boneparth, Herman J. Fliederblum and Arthur G. Carney of counsel), for respondent.


As to each defendant: Judgment affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Steinberg, Rutkins, Thiede, Valentine

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 12, 1938
277 N.Y. 728 (N.Y. 1938)

In People v. Steinberg (277 N.Y. 728) (collapse of a building) there was no opinion in any court but the District Attorney stated in the record on appeal: "They saw the many violations of law which were indulged in."

Summary of this case from People v. Joseph
Case details for

People v. Steinberg, Rutkins, Thiede, Valentine

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LOUIS STEINBERG, MAX…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 12, 1938

Citations

277 N.Y. 728 (N.Y. 1938)
14 N.E.2d 823

Citing Cases

People v. Joseph

In People v. Polstein ( 184 App. Div. 260, affd. 226 N.Y. 593) (collapse of building) the court stated (p.…