From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Powell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 6, 1997
681 N.E.2d 1278 (N.Y. 1997)

Opinion

Argued March 24, 1997

Decided May 6, 1997

APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered May 2, 1996, which affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court (John P. Collins, J.), rendered in Bronx County, after a nonjury trial, convicting defendant of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree.

Bonnie B. Goldburg, New York City, and Daniel L. Greenberg for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney of Bronx County, Bronx ( Elizabeth F. Bernhardt and Joseph N. Ferdenzi of counsel), for respondent.


People v Powell, 227 A.D.2d 102, affirmed.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

In People v Hollman ( 79 N.Y.2d 181, 191), we reaffirmed that police officers, acting upon an articulable reason, may approach an individual to request information concerning the individual's identity, destination or reason for being in an area and, "[i]f the individual is carrying something that would appear to a trained police officer to be unusual, the police officer can ask about that object." Defendant was observed by two Department of Sanitation peace officers in an area known for illegal dumping, with a 50-gallon cardboard barrel protruding from his car trunk. After defendant passed the officers twice, turned off his car's headlights, and backed the wrong way up a oneway street to a spot where there was a hole in a fence, the officers reasonably inquired of defendant whether he intended to dump the barrel, and what was in the barrel. Thus, there is support in the record for the Appellate Division's determination that the officers' request for information was justified. Defendant's motion to suppress his response (that he had killed his girlfriend, and her body was in the barrel) and the physical evidence was properly denied.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Powell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 6, 1997
681 N.E.2d 1278 (N.Y. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Powell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TYRONE POWELL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 6, 1997

Citations

681 N.E.2d 1278 (N.Y. 1997)
681 N.E.2d 1278
659 N.Y.S.2d 832

Citing Cases

People v. Johnson

02, [4]). Supreme Court properly refused to suppress the weapon discarded by defendant while the police were…

People v. Hatcher

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The police had articulable reasons for requesting information from the…