From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ping

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 4, 1994
207 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

August 4, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.).


Since defendant never moved before the trial court to withdraw his plea (CPL 220.60) or to vacate the judgment of conviction (CPL 440.10), he has not preserved for appellate review the issue of the voluntariness of his plea (People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662), and we decline to consider it in the interest of justice. Were we to consider this issue, we would deem it to be without merit since an examination of the record indicates that defendant's guilty plea was voluntarily and knowingly entered. We find no abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed.

Concur — Sullivan, P.J., Wallach, Ross, Rubin and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Ping

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 4, 1994
207 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Ping

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KUO PING, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 4, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 262 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
615 N.Y.S.2d 993

Citing Cases

Peace v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co.

¶ 49. The following courts have reached the same conclusion:Shalimar Contractors Inc. v. American States…