From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pascale

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 3, 1980
48 N.Y.2d 997 (N.Y. 1980)

Opinion

Argued December 11, 1979

Decided January 3, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, JOHN J. REILLY, J.

S. Simpson Gray and Louis A. Garcia for appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney (Cary W. Sucoff and Alan D. Marrus of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The argument that the defendant should be relieved of his guilty plea was not raised by motion in the court of first instance prior to conviction and therefore has not been preserved for our review (People v Bell, 47 N.Y.2d 839; People v Adams, 46 N.Y.2d 1047). The denials of his postconviction motions are not before us on this appeal.

With respect to the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, raised for the first time on appeal, there is nothing apparent in this record which would support this contention.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Pascale

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 3, 1980
48 N.Y.2d 997 (N.Y. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Pascale

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY PASCALE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 3, 1980

Citations

48 N.Y.2d 997 (N.Y. 1980)
425 N.Y.S.2d 547
401 N.E.2d 904

Citing Cases

Rutigliano v. Lamanna

1. Procedural Default of Her Guilty Plea New York courts have long relied on the preservation requirement to…

People v. Wooley

Judgments affirmed. Not having raised the issue by motion to vacate or otherwise at nisi prius, defendant's…