Opinion
195 SSM 36.
December 14, 2006.
Submitted by Paul J. Connolly, for appellant.
Submitted by Laura Conley O'Hanlon, for respondent.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed. Defendant's claim that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the verdict is unpreserved, his claim that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence is beyond our power to review, and his ineffective assistance of counsel claim is without merit.