Summary
finding that the defendant's "oral and videotaped post[-]arrest statements, as well as the observations of the responding police officers," "supported the trier of fact's determination that although intoxicated, defendant had the intent to cause serious physical injury when he stabbed the victim in the chest"
Summary of this case from Waiters v. LeeOpinion
2012-11-15
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis NATAL, Defendant–Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Angie Louie of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michelle W. Cohen of counsel), for respondent.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Angie Louie of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Michelle W. Cohen of counsel), for respondent.
FRIEDMAN, J.P., CATTERSON, RENWICK, DeGRASSE, ROMÁN, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered January 21, 2011, convicting defendant, after a bench trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 18 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentence to 15 years, and otherwise affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). The evidence supported the trier of fact's determination that although intoxicated, defendant had the intent to cause serious physical injury when he stabbed the victim in the chest ( seePenal Law § 15.25). Defendant's oral and videotaped postarrest statements, as well as the observations of the responding police officers, contradicted defendant's claim that he was so intoxicatedthat he was unable to form the requisite criminal intent ( see generally People v. Sirico, 17 N.Y.3d 744, 746, 929 N.Y.S.2d 14, 952 N.E.2d 1006 [2011] ).
We find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.