From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Morenito [4th Dept 2001

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2001
281 A.D.2d 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 21, 2001.

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bender, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 1st Degree.

BEFORE: PIGOTT, JR., P. J., HAYES, SCUDDER, BURNS AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum:

Defendant contends that, because the People failed to file a CPL 710.30 notice, Supreme Court erred in denying his motion to preclude a Rochester police officer from testifying that, when he heard defendant's voice following defendant's arrest, he recognized it as a voice he heard in many of the telephone conversations intercepted pursuant to an eavesdropping warrant. We disagree. The identification of defendant's voice by a trained police officer who had become familiar with it while monitoring over 150 telephone calls over a 20-day period was confirmatory and therefore not subject to the notice requirement of CPL 710.30 ( see, People v. Deleon, 273 A.D.2d 27, 28, lv. denied ___N.Y.2d___ [decided Nov. 20, 2000]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he was denied due process by the substitution of the Trial Justice during jury deliberations ( see, People v. Artist, ___ N Y 2d ___ [decided Dec. 14, 2000]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see, CPL 470.15 [a]).


Summaries of

People v. Morenito [4th Dept 2001

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 21, 2001
281 A.D.2d 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Morenito [4th Dept 2001

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. SANTOS CORNELIO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 21, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 928 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 841

Citing Cases

People v. Cruz

t contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel's failure to move to…

People v. Mortel

The statute's focus is on "in-court identifications predicated on earlier police-arranged confrontations…