From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Minifie

Supreme Court of California
Jul 27, 1995
43 Cal. Rptr. 2d 680 (Cal. 1995)

Summary

invalidating an injunction which forbade the wearing of clothing identifying the wearer as a member of one of two named gangs and the use of gestures, symbols, or other communication that described or referred to one of the gangs in question

Summary of this case from City of Harvard v. Gaut

Opinion


Page __

__ Cal.4th __ 43 Cal.Rptr.2d 680, 899 P.2d 66 PEOPLE, Respondent, v. Steve Arthur MINIFIE, Appellant. No. S046382. Supreme Court of California July 27, 1995

         Prior report: Cal.App., 39 Cal.Rptr.2d 445.

         Respondent's petition for review GRANTED.

         [43 Cal.Rptr.2d 681] [ 899 P.2d 67] LUCAS, C.J., and KENNARD, ARABIAN, BAXTER and GEORGE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Minifie

Supreme Court of California
Jul 27, 1995
43 Cal. Rptr. 2d 680 (Cal. 1995)

invalidating an injunction which forbade the wearing of clothing identifying the wearer as a member of one of two named gangs and the use of gestures, symbols, or other communication that described or referred to one of the gangs in question

Summary of this case from City of Harvard v. Gaut
Case details for

People v. Minifie

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE, Respondent, v. Steve Arthur MINIFIE, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 27, 1995

Citations

43 Cal. Rptr. 2d 680 (Cal. 1995)
899 P.2d 66

Citing Cases

People v. Carey

Submission of additional briefing, otherwise required by rule 29.3, California Rules of Court, is deferred…

City of Harvard v. Gaut

Even the identifying colors and symbols of the type of street gangs that appear to be the focus of the…