From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Middleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 24, 2006
33 A.D.3d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

No. 2003-01266.

October 24, 2006.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 16, 2005 ( People v Middleton, 18 AD3d 670), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 22, 2003.

Before: Florio, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]).


Summaries of

People v. Middleton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 24, 2006
33 A.D.3d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Middleton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANA MIDDLETON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 24, 2006

Citations

33 A.D.3d 941 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 7760
822 N.Y.S.2d 459

Citing Cases

Middleton v. Ercole

Middleton then applied pro se for a writ of error coram nobis, claiming that his appellate counsel provided…