From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McGourty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 21, 1989
153 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

September 21, 1989

Appeal from the County Court of Saratoga County (Williams, J.).


In April 1988, as part of a plea-bargain arrangement, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of burglary in the third degree in full satisfaction of a two-count indictment. Pursuant to the agreement, defendant was later allowed to, among other things, plead guilty to a reduced misdemeanor charge of driving while under the influence of alcohol. Thereafter, defendant was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate prison term of 2 to 4 years on the burglary conviction. He also received a fine and a definite term of one year for the misdemeanor conviction, to be served concurrently with the burglary sentence. This appeal followed.

We affirm. Initially, defendant contends that his plea of guilty was not voluntarily made. Notably, defendant failed to preserve this issue for appellate review by either moving to withdraw his plea or by moving to vacate his judgment of conviction (see, People v. Smith, 146 A.D.2d 828, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 669). Since defendant's plea allocutions were both clear and unequivocal, we see no reason to reverse on this issue as an exercise of discretion in the interest of justice. Next, we find no merit to defendant's claim that the mandatory minimum sentence on the burglary conviction required by Penal Law § 70.06 imposed upon him as a second felony offender is unconstitutional as applied to him. We see nothing unusual or extenuating concerning the particular facts surrounding defendant's case to indicate that the statute was unconstitutionally applied (see, People v. Collins, 134 A.D.2d 607, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 1005; see also, People v. Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, cert denied sub nom. Brown v. New York, 423 U.S. 950). Finally, in our view, defendant's sentence was neither harsh nor excessive.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Levine, Mercure and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McGourty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 21, 1989
153 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. McGourty

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL McGOURTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 21, 1989

Citations

153 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
545 N.Y.S.2d 434

Citing Cases

People v. Saletnik

After a further confusing colloquy between County Court and defendant, the court asked defendant, "Is it true…

People v. Linares

This appeal followed. Defendant's argument that his plea was neither knowing nor voluntary was not preserved…