From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Martin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1981
419 N.E.2d 346 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued January 5, 1981

Decided February 10, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, DANIEL F. McMAHON, J., LEONARD SANDLER, J.

Lewis R. Friedman, Herman Kaufman, Jack T. Litman, Richard M. Asche and Sharon L. Norton for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Jerrold L. Neugarten, Robert M. Pitler and William J. Comiskey of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed. In this case, in which the Appellate Division affirmed the findings made by the suppression court, we cannot say as a matter of law that probable cause to enter the apartment and to conduct a search was not established. As to the sentencing issue raised by the defendant, no question of law was preserved for our review.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

People v. Martin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 10, 1981
419 N.E.2d 346 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

People v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MELVIN MARTIN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 10, 1981

Citations

419 N.E.2d 346 (N.Y. 1981)
419 N.E.2d 346
437 N.Y.S.2d 668

Citing Cases

USA-India Export-Import, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.

There is no indication that the forum selection clause is divisible.A contrary interpretation, which would…

UMS Solutions, Inc. v. Biosound Esaote, Inc.

sting before they entered into their agreement or if the parties agreed to modify their agreement during the…