From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Marshall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1988
144 A.D.2d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

November 15, 1988

Appeal from the Erie County Court, Dillon, J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court did not err in permitting the prosecutor to address leading questions to a witness who was obviously unwilling, reluctant, and hostile (see, Richardson, Evidence § 483 [Prince 10th ed]; People v Sexton, 187 N.Y. 495, 509; Becker v. Koch, 104 N.Y. 394, 401-402). The testimony of that witness, together with all of the other testimony in the case, provided sufficient proof that defendant knowingly and intentionally aided in the purse snatching.


Summaries of

People v. Marshall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1988
144 A.D.2d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EUGENE MARSHALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1988

Citations

144 A.D.2d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

05; People v Medina, 53 N.Y.2d 951, 953). Were we to review in the interest of justice, we would find that in…

People v. Davis

The court was aware that Toscano had given statements to the police that supported the People's case, but…