From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Licas

Supreme Court of California
Mar 1, 2006
41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 69 (Cal. 2006)

Summary

In People v. Cross, (2006)130 P.3d 930 [41 Cal.Rptr.3d 69] review granted Mar. 1, 2006, S139791, the California Supreme Court has granted review to address the following issues: “Did the court prejudicially err in instructing the jury that the victim’s pregnancy or subsequent abortion could constitute great bodily injury within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022.7 and in failing to instruct the jury on the meaning of ‘personal infliction?

Summary of this case from People v. Lopez

Opinion


Page __

__ Cal.4th __ 41 Cal.Rptr.3d 69, 130 P.3d 930 PEOPLE v. LICAS. No. S140032. Supreme Court of California March 1, 2006

         Prior report: Cal.App., 36 Cal.Rptr.3d 110.

         Petition for review granted.

         GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, MORENO, and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Licas

Supreme Court of California
Mar 1, 2006
41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 69 (Cal. 2006)

In People v. Cross, (2006)130 P.3d 930 [41 Cal.Rptr.3d 69] review granted Mar. 1, 2006, S139791, the California Supreme Court has granted review to address the following issues: “Did the court prejudicially err in instructing the jury that the victim’s pregnancy or subsequent abortion could constitute great bodily injury within the meaning of Penal Code section 12022.7 and in failing to instruct the jury on the meaning of ‘personal infliction?

Summary of this case from People v. Lopez
Case details for

People v. Licas

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. LICAS.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 1, 2006

Citations

41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 69 (Cal. 2006)
130 P.3d 930

Citing Cases

People v. Lopez

We therefore address defendant’s contention only as it applies to the enhancement under section 12022.7,…