From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Konono

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 18, 1961
176 N.E.2d 101 (N.Y. 1961)

Opinion

Argued April 26, 1961

Decided May 18, 1961

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, EZRA HANAGAN, J.

Wilfred R. Caron for appellant.

Arthur A. Darrigrand, District Attorney ( J. Stuart Fero of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered. The motion to strike out the allegations of prior felony convictions contained in the indictment should have been granted on the strength of section 275-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure. By that provision the Legislature intended to prohibit the introduction as part of the main case on the trial of evidence of prior convictions even though the indictment was returned prior to the effective date of the statute (cf. People v. Oliver, 1 N.Y.2d 152). No opinion.

Concur: Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.


Since the Legislature made the amendment to section 275-b effective July 1, 1957, the courts have no right to apply the new law to an indictment which had been returned before that date. Even if in some instances reasons of policy might justify retroactive application of the amendment, this case with its strong proof of guilt presents no such situation.


Summaries of

People v. Konono

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 18, 1961
176 N.E.2d 101 (N.Y. 1961)
Case details for

People v. Konono

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES KONONO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 18, 1961

Citations

176 N.E.2d 101 (N.Y. 1961)
176 N.E.2d 101
217 N.Y.S.2d 92

Citing Cases

People v. Van Dusen

While section 275-b was enacted as a result of the De Santis case, it has no retroactive effect to defendant.…

People v. Sullivan

These provisions being remedial and procedural in nature and there being nothing in or accompanying the…