From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Komnenus

California Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Jun 8, 2010
No. F058475 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 8, 2010)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER KOMNENUS, Defendant and Appellant. F058475 California Court of Appeal, Fifth District June 8, 2010

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

Super. Ct. Nos. MF008608A and MF008813A

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING

Ardaiz, P.J.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 21, 2010, be modified as follows:

On page 5, insert the following paragraph preceding the “DISPOSITION”:

Pursuant to a standing order of this court issued on February 11, 2010, the issue of the applicability of the January 25, 2010, amendment to Penal Code section 4019 (Stats. 2009-2010, 3d Ex. Sess, ch. 28, § 50) is deemed raised without further briefing by the parties. The amendment increased the amount of presentence conduct credit available to defendants who are not required to register as sex offenders and whose current and prior offenses do not include serious or violent felonies. In People v. Rodriguez (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1, we held that the 2010 amendment applies prospectively only and does not violate the constitutional guarantee of equal protection of the laws. Since appellant was sentenced before the effective date of the amendment, he is not entitled to any additional custody credit.

Except for the modification set forth, the opinion previously filed remains unchanged.

This modification does not effect a change in judgment.

The petition for rehearing filed by appellant is denied.

WE CONCUR: Levy, J. Gomes, J.


Summaries of

People v. Komnenus

California Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Jun 8, 2010
No. F058475 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 8, 2010)
Case details for

People v. Komnenus

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER KOMNENUS, Defendant…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 8, 2010

Citations

No. F058475 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 8, 2010)