From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Horning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 1999
263 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

July 9, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Parenti, J. — Murder, 2nd Degree.

PRESENT: LAWTON, J. P., HAYES, WISNER, HURLBUTT AND SCUDDER, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the jury verdict convicting him of depraved mind murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25) and manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20) is repugnant. The People respond that defendant's contention is not preserved for our review and, in any event, is without merit. We disagree. Defendant preserved his contention for our review by raising that issue before the jury was discharged ( see generally, People v. Alfaro, 66 N.Y.2d 985, 987). Furthermore, because defendant "was convicted for acting intentionally and recklessly as to the same result, the death of the victim" ( People v. Trappier, 87 N.Y.2d 55, 59), the jury verdict is repugnant ( see, People v. Robinson, 145 A.D.2d 184, affd 75 N.Y.2d 879; see also, People v. Gallagher, 69 N.Y.2d 525) Consequently, the judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted.


Summaries of

People v. Horning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 9, 1999
263 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Horning

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 9, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 955 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 824

Citing Cases

Sweet v. Bennett

The second rule, it seems to me, abandons them. Regrettably, New York courts are continuing to apply the…

People v. Parker

"Defendant's challenges to the population studies relied upon to estimate the probability of a coincidental…