From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 2001
289 A.D.2d 40 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

5503

December 6, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered May 31, 2000, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 17 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

SHERYL FELDMAN, for respondent.

JAN HOTH-UZZO, for defendant-appellant.

PA Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.


Defendant, who successfully moved for suppression of his statements made prior to Miranda warnings, argues for the first time on appeal that his post-Miranda statements should also have been suppressed as part of a continuous interrogation. However, at the hearing, defendant expressly limited his suppression motion to the pre-Miranda statements and the record does not establish that "in response to a protest by a party, the court expressly decided the question raised on appeal" (CPL 470.05). Accordingly, defendant's present claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find no basis for reversal (see, People v. Chapple, 38 N.Y.2d 112).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Hines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 2001
289 A.D.2d 40 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Hines

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. MORGAN HINES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 40 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 608

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Therefore, as there is no evidence that anything tainted Defendant's statements made after Miranda was…

People v. Williams

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ. Since no issues relating to defendant's…