From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Henry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 29, 1988
143 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

August 29, 1988

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.).


Ordered that Arthur I. King is relieved as the attorney for the defendant and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Steven A. Feldman of 300 Rabro Drive, Suite 152, Hauppauge, New York, 11788, is assigned as counsel to perfect the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the People are directed to furnish a copy of the stenographic minutes to the new assigned counsel; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the defendant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order and the People shall serve and file their brief within 120 days of the date of this decision and order; by prior decision and order of this court, the defendant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers (including the typewritten stenographic minutes) and on the typewritten briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

The brief submitted by the defendant's assigned appellate counsel consisted essentially of a one-page "Digest of Essential Facts" and a 1 1/2-page argument. Appellate counsel merely set forth the point headings for the two issues the defendant sought to raise with only a two-sentence discussion of one point and absolutely no discussion of the other point.

Under the circumstances, the defendant was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel when the attorney appointed to handle his appeal filed a wholly deficient brief (see, People v Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606, on remand 74 A.D.2d 928, appeal after remand 81 A.D.2d 838). Accordingly, a new assignment of counsel and reconsideration of the appeal is required, since "neither a review of the record by the Appellate Division nor a pro se brief can substitute for the single-minded advocacy of appellate counsel" (People v Casiano, 67 N.Y.2d 906, 907). Brown, J.P., Lawrence, Weinstein and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Henry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 29, 1988
143 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HUGH HENRY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 29, 1988

Citations

143 A.D.2d 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Giovanni S. (anonymous).Admin. for Children's Serv.

In holding that this brief was “wholly deficient,” the Court observed that it contained a “lengthy,…

In Matter of Giovanni S. v. Jasmin A.

In holding that this brief was "wholly deficient," the Court observed that it contained a "lengthy,…