From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Haidara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 29, 2009
65 A.D.3d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1074.

September 29, 2009.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. FitzGerald, J.), rendered September 26, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 12½ to 25 years, unanimously affirmed.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (William A. Loeb of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Philip Morrow of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Renwick and Richter, JJ.


The court properly received evidence of uncharged crimes to complete the victim's narrative, describe the events leading up to the charged crime and explain the relationship between defendant and the victim ( see People v Leeson, 12 NY3d 823, 827; People v Dorm, 12 NY3d 16, 19), as well as to place the events in question in a believable context and explain the victim's delay in reporting defendant's conduct ( see People v Rosario, 34 AD3d 370, lv denied 8 NY3d 949). Although the evidence was extensive, it was not unduly inflammatory and the court's thorough limiting instruction was sufficient to minimize any possible prejudice.

Defendant's arguments concerning the prosecutor's opening statement and summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal.


Summaries of

People v. Haidara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 29, 2009
65 A.D.3d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Haidara

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. YACOUBA HAIDARA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 29, 2009

Citations

65 A.D.3d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6726
885 N.Y.S.2d 415

Citing Cases

People v. Khan

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in permitting the prosecution to elicit evidence that…

PEOPLE v. KHAN

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in permitting the prosecution to elicit evidence that…