From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 7, 2001
284 A.D.2d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

June 7, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), rendered August 26, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 12 years to life, unanimously modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of vacating the sentence and remanding for resentencing, and otherwise affirmed.

Nisha M. Desai, for respondent.

Arthur S. Friedman, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Lerner, Rubin, Buckley, Marlow, JJ.


Since defendant controverted his persistent felony offender status and did not receive copies of his predicate violent felony offender statements until the day of sentencing, he was statutorily entitled to an adjournment of the hearing for at least two days upon his request (see, CPL 400.15; 400.16[2]; People v. Shabazz, 104 A.D.2d 776,lv denied 64 N.Y.2d 654). In addition, although defendant's predicate convictions were more than 10 years old, the statements were incomplete in that they did not set forth the date of commencement and the date of termination, as well as the place of imprisonment, for each period of incarceration as is required to toll the 10-year period after which a previous conviction may not be used for purposes of sentencing as a second or persistent violent felony offender (see, CPL 400.15; 400.16[2]; Penal Law § 70.04[b][iv]; § 70.08[1]). To the extent that any of these issues were not properly preserved, we choose to review them in the interest of justice. Accordingly, defendant is entitled to resentencing with further proceedings on his persistent violent felony offender status, including the filing by the People of proper predicate statements (see, People v. Sailor, 65 N.Y.2d 224, cert denied 474 U.S. 982).


Summaries of

People v. Gines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 7, 2001
284 A.D.2d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Gines

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. RUBEN GINES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 7, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 846

Citing Cases

People v. Watkins

Because the tolling provision of Penal Law § 70.04(1)(b)(v) is implicated, the persistent violent felony…

People v. Hamilton

The sentences for the prior convictions were beyond the 10-year time limit, and the court failed to make a…