From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Edmonson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2004
4 A.D.3d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

1990-03527, 2000-09694.

Decided February 17, 2004.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this court dated December 2, 2002 ( People v. Edmonson, 300 A.D.2d 317), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 11, 1990, and an order of the same court dated October 3, 2000.

Samuel Edmonson, Dannemora, N.Y., appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.

Carol L. Kahn, New York, N.Y., former appellate counsel.

Before: GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA L. TOWNES and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745).

KRAUSMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, TOWNES and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Edmonson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 17, 2004
4 A.D.3d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Edmonson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. SAMUEL EDMONSON, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 17, 2004

Citations

4 A.D.3d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
771 N.Y.S.2d 682

Citing Cases

People v. Edmonson

Thereafter, the defendant filed a writ coram nobis in the Appellate Division, on the basis of ineffective…

Edmonson v. Artus

The Appellate Division denied his application on February 17, 2004. People v. Edmonson, 771 N.Y.S.2d 682…