From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Donald Haywood

Michigan Court of Appeals
Oct 27, 1970
27 Mich. App. 377 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

Docket No. 8,578.

Decided October 27, 1970.

Appeal from Genesee, Anthony J. Mansour, J. Submitted Division 2 October 6, 1970, at Lansing. (Docket No. 8,578.) Decided October 27, 1970.

Donald Haywood was convicted, on his plea of guilty, of attempted larceny from a motor vehicle. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, Robert F. Leonard, Prosecuting Attorney, and Donald A. Kuebler, Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

William J. Hayes, for defendant on appeal.

Before: LEVIN, P.J., and T.M. BURNS and J.E. HUGHES, JJ.

Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.


The defendant was charged with the offense of attempted larceny from a motor vehicle (MCLA §§ 750.92, 750.356a [Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.287, Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.588(1)]) and was convicted upon his plea of guilty.

He claims that the record shows that the completed offense was committed. That is not a ground for setting aside his conviction. See People v. Pickett (1970), 21 Mich. App. 246; People v. Collins (1968), 380 Mich. 131.

The trial judge conducted an exemplary examination of the defendant before accepting his plea of guilty.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Donald Haywood

Michigan Court of Appeals
Oct 27, 1970
27 Mich. App. 377 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

People v. Donald Haywood

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. DONALD HAYWOOD

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 27, 1970

Citations

27 Mich. App. 377 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
183 N.W.2d 623

Citing Cases

People v. Royal

The fact that the record shows the completed offense was committed is not a ground for reversing a plea-based…

People v. Genes

I agree with the majority that the fact that the substantive crime was completed here does not preclude…