Summary
In Daneff, it was claimed, as here, that the statutory scheme created unequal and irrational treatment of offenders by not distinguishing between possessors of like aggregate quantities of drug, where one possession might be of a relatively pure drug and the other possession could be of a far less concentrated substance.
Summary of this case from People v. CarterOpinion
Argued March 21, 1972
Decided June 1, 1972
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ISIDORE DOLLINGER, J.
Abraham Werfel for appellant.
Burton B. Roberts, District Attorney ( Russell C. Tharp, Jr. of counsel), for respondent.
Order affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.