From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Courtney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 1998
249 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 20, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.)


Ordered that the order, as amended, is reversed, on the law, the defendant's motion is granted, the judgment of conviction is vacated, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

The People correctly concede that the defendant's judgment of conviction must be vacated because he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel by counsel's failure to move for dismissal of the indictment on statutory speedy trial grounds ( see, CPL 30.30). An approximately 14-month period between the defendant's indictment and the People's declaration of readiness is clearly chargeable to the People, as the issue regarding that same period of time was previously litigated and found to be chargeable to the People in a prior speedy trial motion by the defendant to dismiss other charges. Although the People did not respond to that prior motion, they had ample opportunity to litigate the issue, and may not relitigate it in the present context where the issue and the parties are identical ( see generally, People v. Carroll, 200 A.D.2d 630, 631; People v. McGriff, 130 A.D.2d 141, 152). Thus, this period of time was well in excess of the six-month period mandated in CPL 30.30 (1) (a), and dismissal of the indictment would have been required.

By failing to make the speedy trial motion, and by allowing the defendant to plead guilty to the present charge, defense counsel's actions resulted in the waiver of this meritorious and dispositive issue ( see, People v. Lawrence, 64 N.Y.2d 200, 203). This omission by counsel, which cannot be attributed to trial strategy, denied the defendant of meaningful representation by counsel ( see, People v. Pickens, 216 A.D.2d 631; People v. O'Connell, 133 A.D.2d 970).

In light of our determination, the defendant's remaining contention is academic.

Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Courtney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 20, 1998
249 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Courtney

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES COURTNEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 20, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 667

Citing Cases

People v. Weekes

Judgment of conviction (Keshia J. Espinal, J.), rendered October 11, 2019, affirmed. Defendant waived his…

People v. Titus

The resulting total of 190 days exceeds the statutory six-month speedy trial period of 183 days ( seeCPL…