From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Charleston

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 20, 2011
88 A.D.3d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-20

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.James CHARLESTON, Defendant–Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Carl S. Kaplan of counsel), for appellant.Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (David C. Bornstein of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J. at suppression hearing; Renee A. White, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered June 23, 2009, convicting defendant of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender whose prior conviction was a violent felony, to a term of 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea ( see People v. Frederick, 45 N.Y.2d 520, 410 N.Y.S.2d 555, 382 N.E.2d 1332 [1978] ). At sentencing, defense counsel simply announced that defendant wished to withdraw his plea. Although defendant and his counsel received a suitable opportunity to speak, neither provided any ground for the motion. Defendant asserts that he also made a written plea withdrawal motion. Although the record on appeal contains a copy of such a motion, there is no evidence that the motion was ever filed, or that the sentencing court knew of its existence. In any event, the contents of the written motion did not require withdrawal of the plea. The plea allocution establishes that the plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary, and it refutes defendant's claim of innocence.

Defendant's claim regarding an alleged violation of People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, 213 N.Y.S.2d 448, 173 N.E.2d 881 [1961], cert. denied 368 U.S. 866, 82 S.Ct. 117, 7 L.Ed.2d 64 [1961] was forfeited by his guilty plea ( see People v. Delgado, 4 A.D.3d 310, 311, 771 N.Y.S.2d 666 [2004], lv. denied 2 N.Y.3d 798, 781 N.Y.S.2d 297, 814 N.E.2d 469 [2004] ), as well as being both unpreserved and without merit.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

GONZALEZ, P.J., MAZZARELLI, SWEENY, ABDUS–SALAAM, ROMÁN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Charleston

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 20, 2011
88 A.D.3d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Charleston

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.James CHARLESTON…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7350
931 N.Y.S.2d 226

Citing Cases

Charleston v. Gonyea

Leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals was denied. People v. Charleston, 88 A.D.3d 549, leave…