From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cedeno

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 8, 1981
52 N.Y.2d 847 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued December 15, 1980

Decided January 8, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, E. LEO MILONAS, J., ERNST ROSENBERGER, J.

Robert S. Dean and William E. Hellerstein for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (Daniel Castleman and Jerrold Neugarten of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant's only contention in our court is that the lapse of 13 months between his arrest and his arraignment on the indictment was an unreasonable delay in prosecution which constituted a denial of his constitutional right to due process in consequence of which his conviction should be reversed and the indictment dismissed (People v Singer, 44 N.Y.2d 241; People v Staley, 41 N.Y.2d 789). While defendant did make a motion to dismiss the indictment under CPL 30.30, he made no motion to dismiss based on the contention he now advances. In that circumstance he has failed to preserve that contention for our review (People v Lieberman, 47 N.Y.2d 931).

Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur; Chief Judge COOKE taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Cedeno

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 8, 1981
52 N.Y.2d 847 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

People v. Cedeno

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MAXIMO CEDENO…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 8, 1981

Citations

52 N.Y.2d 847 (N.Y. 1981)
437 N.Y.S.2d 72
418 N.E.2d 665

Citing Cases

People v. Udzinski

In People v Thomas ( 50 N.Y.2d 467, 473), for example, the Court of Appeals stated that "the rule requiring a…

People v. Smith

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of assault in…