From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1994
203 A.D.2d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 19, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.).


While the jury first deliberated for only three hours before the trial court at defendant's first trial declared a mistrial, there is no minimum time a jury must deliberate before a mistrial is considered (People v Baptiste, 72 N.Y.2d 356, 361). Following the procedure set forth in Matter of Plummer v Rothwax ( 63 N.Y.2d 243, 252), the trial court inquired of each juror whether further deliberations would be fruitless. Since the sole issue was identification, and since each juror unequivocally stated that the jury was hopelessly deadlocked, it cannot be said that declaring a mistrial was an abuse of discretion (CPL 310.60).

In addition no objection was made until after the court declared the mistrial.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 19, 1994
203 A.D.2d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ELWOOD CAMPBELL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 246

Citing Cases

Campbell v. Brunnelle

The First Department affirmed his conviction on April 19, 1994. People v. Campbell, 203 A.D.2d 127, 610…

People v. Wincelowicz

g the court's broad discretion under these statutes ( see, e.g., People v. Sparacino, 150 A.D.2d 814), an…